Tester's Digest

A weekly source of software testing news

TESTER’S DIGEST

ISSUE #75 - October 21, 2018

Let’s take a look at the intersection of UX and QA fields. I’ve seen my share of usability bugs devolve into opinion-based arguments, and have been searching for a more scientific foundation to the usability testing endeavor. Here are some resources.

Topic: Testing Usability

Laws of UX, a great read for testers and other engineers that can help form a shared foundation between UX and QA so we can file usability bugs from first principles rather than by gut feel:

https://lawsofux.com/

Common usability bugs in web applications:

https://www.stickyminds.com/article/testing-usability-standards-our-customers-expect

What a usability bug might look like:

https://offbeattesting.com/2017/02/14/when-your-workflow-is-a-bug/

Human experience testing with the example of wearable devices:

https://www.stickyminds.com/article/testing-wearables-human-experience

Cognitive biases in user research (which are also worth keeping in mind for QA):

https://www.mindtheproduct.com/2018/08/cognitive-biases-the-questions-you-shouldnt-be-asking-by-cindy-alvarez/

If Satan designed a form to input your phone number - pure satire but jostles the brain for usability testing ideas.

https://uxdesign.cc/if-satan-was-a-web-designer-dc5cdf06dff9#.vj6c4pjzp

Off-Topic

Not completely off topic for UX, but tangential… Interesting take on the product being a function that transforms inputs (is defined by client) into outputs (defined by Product Management), the function’s body being the domain of UX. I liked how this approach would make it nicely testable.

http://www.feltpresence.com/functions.html


If you received this email directly then you’re already signed up, thanks! Else if this newsletter issue was forwarded to you and you’d like to get one weekly, then you can subscribe at http://testersdigest.mehras.net

If you come across content worth sharing, please send me a link at testersdigest@mehras.net